Legal Opinion

Hamblin v. Woolley

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1946No. 4783PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Judge.

Inasmuch as the wives of the parties appear herein only by reason of their marital status, and were not otherwise involved in the litigation, we will designate the appellants as plaintiff and the appellees as defendant. The facts out of which this cause arose (upon a complaint by plaintiff to quiet title, and answer seeking like affirmative relief by defendant) may be stated briefly as follows:

William M. Brown, about the year 1915 took possession of a tract of land in House Rock Valley, including the SE^ SEJ4 of section 14, T 19, N, R 3 E, Coconino County, Ariz., upon which he…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moelle v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Tarpey v. MadsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Fourzan v. CurtisArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. McKenzie v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Barringer v. LilleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. StrombergMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Henningsen v. StrombergMontana Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API