Legal Opinion
Medford v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided June 15, 2000No. 03-97-00769-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND
BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.
On original submission, we affirmed appellant Billy Doyle Medford’s conviction for possession of cocaine, but reversed his conviction for escape and rendered a judgment of acquittal. See Medford v. State, 990 S.W.2d 799, 806-11 (Tex.App.—Austin 1999). The State petitioned for discretionary review, challenging our conclusion that the evidence did not support the escape conviction. 1 The court of criminal appeals vacated our judgment and remanded the cause for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. See Medford v. State, 13 S.W.3d 769, 774…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Medford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- United States v. Francisco Corral-Franco, Maria Guadalupe Corral-Franco, and Maria Aparis FrancoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Woods v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Lawhorn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mack v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Carlos Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Henry Marsh Diggs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- Jerry Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- Jerry Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.