Legal Opinion

Mack v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 2001No. 99-CF-1611PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, Associate Judge:

After a jury trial, appellant Cornell G. Mack was convicted of assaulting a police officer (“APO”), in violation of D.C.Code § 22-505(a) (1996); escape from an officer, in violation of § 22-2601(a)(2); carrying a pistol without a license (“CPWL”), in violation of § 22-3204(a); possessing an unregistered firearm (“UF”), in violation of § 6-2311(a) (1995); and possessing unregistered ammunition (“UA”), in violation of § 6-2361(3).1 On appeal, Mack contends *815that: 1) his conviction of APO merges with his conviction of escape; and 2) the evidence presented at trial was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Howard v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
  4. Simms v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Foster v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brawner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Carlos Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API