Aaron Perry v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FAHY, Circuit Judge.
At a jury trial appellant was convicted of rape, in violation of § 22-2801, D.C. Code (1951). Intercourse was not in dispute, so that the case against appellant turned upon whether there was consent, or, in contrast, circumstances which made out the crime of rape.
Certain statements of an incriminatory character 1 made to police officers by appellant were testified to by the officers at the trial. Appellant, taking the stand in his own defense, did not deny making the statements but said that some of the things he told the officers and to which they testified were not true.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Upshaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Porter L. Lawson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
3Cited by19 opinions
- Walter Lee Parman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- George A. Mathies v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- John E. Trilling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Joseph W. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Ernest Robert Walton v. United States of America, Elizabeth P. Comley v. United States of America, Kenneth Eddie Chow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.