John E. Trilling v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
These appeals were heard together. In regard to Count 3 in No. 13069, a majority of the court are of opinion there was no error. In regard to the other counts of No. 13069, and in each of the other cases, a majority of the court are of opinion there was prejudicial error in admitting in evidence certain statements the police obtained from appellant. The conviction on Count 3 is affirmed. The other convictions are reversed. *
DANAHER, Circuit Judge.
We consolidated the appeals in these cases because the common question involved the receipt in evidence of Trilling’s confessions or admissions made…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Burger; Concurrence · Bazelon; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- United States v. Philip Vita and Jerald CarmelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Clarence D. Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Dale B. Menard v. John N. Mitchell and John Edgar HooverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- David R. Jones v. United States of America, Willie L. Short, Jr. v. United States of America, Arthur L. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.