Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Cummings

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1921No. Civ. No. 2369PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to quiet his title as against the defendant Frank M. Cummings to 320 acres of land situated in Stanislaus County.

The appeal is by the defendant from the judgment, on the judgment-roll alone, and, therefore, the findings, so far as this record discloses (and, indeed, as must be presumed), contains a full and complete history of the controversy between the parties. From the findings, consequently, the facts herein presented will be extracted, although it is deemed proper first to refer briefly to the several pleadings filed.

The complaint is in the usual form of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Pierce v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Knight v. TrippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. McCord v. AshbaughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Dowd v. GlennCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API