Commonwealth v. Warren
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
Appellant was convicted of rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, and robbery. On this appeal he raises five points of error.(1)
Appellant contends that the trial court’s review of the evidence was biased and prejudicial in two respects: The court did not adequately review inconsistencies in the prosecutrix’s three versions of the incident in question (versions given in a statement to a detective, at preliminary hearing, and at trial); and the court’s brief reference to the inconsistencies amounted to rehabilitation of the prosecutrix.
We note first that counsel for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. NashSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SimsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- State v. MoineOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Commonwealth v. JoinesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. FleegerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.