Legal Opinion

O'CONNOR v. Kaufman

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 1998No. A-97-860PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Severs, Judge.

Our practice is to closely examine all cases in their initial stages to ensure that jurisdiction has been perfected. Our objective is to quickly terminate appeals when we lack jurisdiction to conserve judicial resources and avoid litigation expenses for the parties, which otherwise would be to no avail. Because neither the Nebraska Supreme Court nor this court has directly discussed the particular jurisdictional question which arises in this case, we believe that a published opinion explaining our decision is in order, rather than merely summarily dismissing this appeal as we…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re Interest of RGNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Jarrett v. EichlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Currie Ex Rel. Currie v. Chief School Bus Service, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Rehn v. BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'CONNOR v. KaufmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. O'CONNOR v. KaufmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Waite v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Alderman v. County of AntelopeNebraska Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Alderman v. County of AntelopeNebraska Court of Appeals · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API