Chanute Brick & Tile Co. v. Gas Belt Fuel Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Neosho district court; S. W. Brewster, judge pro tem.
1Opinion of the Court
.The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
The findings of the court are in substance that W. B. Hill, in making the contract marked “Exhibit A,” was promoting a corporation, afterward incorporated as the Gas Belt Fuel Company, and that Hill made the contract for the benefit of the gas company after it should be incorporated; that W. S. Cochrane, as trustee, was expressly acting for the plaintiff brick company; that no formal assignment of the contract was made by Hill to the defendant gas company, but the defendant accepted the contract and derived benefits therefrom, with the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Terre Haute Cooperage, Inc. v. BranscomeMississippi Supreme Court · 1948
- Hall v. WingateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Lantry Contracting Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Boggs Oil & Drilling Co. v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Maxine Devlin Moore v. John C. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.