Schmitz v. Stransky
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant Theresa Ann McColley Schmitz (“McColley”) seeks review of the trial court’s denial of her motion for a new trial in a paternity action. After a jury returned a verdict in favor of respondent Mark Stransky a/k/a Mark Rand (“Stran-sky”), McColley moved for a new trial alleging as error three evidentiary rulings.
Respondent Stransky filed a notice of review seeking review of orders which require him to reimburse the county for attorney fees expended on his behalf and which refuse to appoint counsel to represent him on this appeal. Stransky now argues that Minn.Stat.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Schwartz v. TalmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- A.J.S. v. M.T.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re Paternity of BJHCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Schmitz v. StranskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990