Legal Opinion
Clancy v. Coyne
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 11, 2002No. 01 C 5685PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ST. EVE, District Judge.
Defendant Robert Leo Coyne has previously admitted liability in misappropriating and commingling assets in a Trust for which Plaintiff Deann P. Clancy was a beneficiary and Coyne was trustee. Plaintiff Clancy has filed a summary judgment motion seeking to have judgment entered on the amount of damages that Coyne owes. For the reasons stated herein, Clancy’s summary judgment motion is granted. Clancy’s previously filed motions in limine are dismissed as moot.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Deann P. Clancy is a citizen of the State of Pennsylvania and is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jakob UNTERREINER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- In Re Jeannie Niles, Debtor. Rita G. Otto v. Jeannie NilesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rivera v. GuevaraDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Chicago Title Insurance v. SinikovicDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. SheikhDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020