Legal Opinion

Hudson Nav. Co. v. Murray

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 14, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. Bill by the Hudson Navigation Company against Edward E. Murray, removed from state court. On motion to vacate an order of the Court of Chancery of New Jersey, directing defendant, a nonresident, to appear and plead to complainant’s bill and to set aside the substituted service made by virtue of such order.

1Opinion of the Court

HAIGHT, District Judge.

After ao order was made by this aourt, in a cause between the same parties, vacating an order for substituted service made therein pursuant to section 57 of the Judicial Code (Hudson Navigation Co. v. Murray [D. C.] 233 Fed. 466), the present complainant (who was the plaintiff in that action) filed a bill in the Court of Chancery of New Jersey against the same defendant, wherein lie seeks the same relief as was sought in the action originally brought in this court. It appearing that the defendant was a nonresident of New Jersey and could not he found therein, an order…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Mechanical Appliance Co. v. CastlemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harvey v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
  2. Doherty v. McDowellDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1921
  3. Goade v. VollrathDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1948
  4. Paragon Coal & Coke Co. v. J. W. Kirby & Sons Coal Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1925
  5. McCoy v. SilerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API