Ivy v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 7]. For the reasons discussed below, the motion will be granted. 2
I. BACKGROUND
The plaintiff alleges that his “2011 tax return was fraudulently filed,” Compl. at 1 (page numbers designated by ECF), and that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) allowed the filer “to retain funds which would have been sent to [him] by means of [a] tax refund,” id. at 2. 3 He characterizes this civil action as a challenge to “a wrongful offset” that did not comply with 26…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jaeger v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hadsell v. United States of America, the Department of TreasuryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Hadsell v. United States of America, the Department of TreasuryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Hadsell v. United States of America, the Department of TreasuryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- James Arthur Luecke and Talia Delcarmen Luecke v. David Casey, Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, in his official capacity; Heather M. Morrissey, in her official and personal capacities; Saundra (last name unknown), in her official and personal capacities; and Kristine (last name unknown), in her official and personal capacitiesDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2026
- SHADOAN v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021