Legal Opinion
Otto Roth & Co. v. Gourmet Pasta, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 13, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In two related actions, inter alia, to recover on certain promissory notes (Action No. 1) and to recover damages based on fraudulent representation and breach of contract (Action No. 2), Otto Roth & Company, Inc., appeals (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), dated August 12, 1999, entered in Action No. 2, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of Gourmet Pasta, Inc., and against it in the principal *294sum of $300,000 on the cause of action to recover damages based on fraudulent representation, and (2), as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mirand v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Brown v. LockwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Iannucci v. ViscardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Marcus Dairy, Inc. v. Jacene Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by6 opinions
- HSH Nordbank AG New York Branch v. SwerdlowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Cirillo v. Slomin's Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2003
- Maisano v. BeckoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- 789 Ninth & 414 East 74th Associates LLC v. HundalaniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- J.J v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.