Legal Opinion
Cirillo v. Slomin's Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*924OPINION OF THE COURT
F. Dana Winslow, J.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 is determined as follows.
This is an action for fraud, negligence and breach of warranty in connection with the installation and operation of an alarm system by Slomin’s Inc. in the home of plaintiffs Vincenzo and Concetta Cirillo. The Slomin’s system purchased by plaintiffs provided for central station monitoring, which contemplated the transmission of a signal from the alarm system via the telephone lines in the event of a break-in. On or about June 27, 1998, plaintiff Vincenzo Cirillo…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Woods v. Maytag Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- BNP Paribas Mortgage Corp. v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Intelsat USA Sales Corp. v. Juch-Tech, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- ADT Security Services, Inc. v. SwensonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Puro v. NEIL ENTERPRISES, INC.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.