Legal Opinion

DePriest v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided November 21, 2000No. 1587993PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, Judge.

These ten consolidated appeals are from judgments of conviction in the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke for solicitation to commit oral sodomy in violation of Code §§ 18.2-29 and 18.2-361. 1 The appellants contend that the trial court erred in ruling that Code § 18.2-361: (1) does not violate the fundamental right to privacy guaranteed by Article I of the Constitution of Virginia; (2) does not violate the prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment contained in Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution of Virginia and in the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Hart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  5. Coleman v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Leung v. SandersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Singson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  3. Yap v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  4. Gerald Lee Tucek v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. TocciCharlottesville County Circuit Court · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API