Legal Opinion

Singson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided November 8, 2005No. 0646041PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT J. HUMPHREYS, Judge.

Appellant Joel Dulay Singson (“Singson”) appeals his conviction, following a conditional guilty plea, for solicitation to commit oral sodomy, in violation of Code §§ 18.2-29 (criminal solicitation) and 18.2-361 (crimes against nature). Based on the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508 (2003), Singson contends that Code § 18.2-361 is facially unconstitutional because it prohibits private acts of consensual sodomy, in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Thus, Singson…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. John Doe v. Gary SettleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  2. Alston v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  3. Roseborough v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  4. Roseborough v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
  5. Anderson Wright, s/k/a Anderson Jevon Wright v. City of Virginia BeachCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API