Haeger v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
The Attorney General, through the Consumer Protection Division of the Department of Justice, served an investigative demand pursuant to ORS 646.618 on petitioner, division manager of Public Finance Corporation, ordering him to appear and testify in connection with an investigation of alleged unlawful business practices. ORS 646.608(1)(k). Petitioner filed a petition to set aside the investigative demand on the ground that (1) his employer was not subject to the provisions of ORS 646.608 because it is not engaged in the sale of goods and services and (2) his employer is exempt from those…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sunshine Dairy v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- United States v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1951
- State v. LaughlinOregon Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by11 opinions
- Berry v. American Express Publishing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. SpeerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Nienke v. Naiman Group, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Lamm v. Amfac Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Cullen v. Investment Strategies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.