Legal Opinion

Lamm v. Amfac Mortgage Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 28, 1980No. 78-1545, CA 14272PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*205BUTTLER, P. J.

Defendant’s demurrer to plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint was sustained. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment taken against them after they declined to plead further. We affirm.

Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged violation of the Unfair Trade Practices Act, ORS 646.605 et seq., based on what they alleged to have been "false or misleading representations” (ORS 646.608(l)(s)) made by defendant regarding the discount fee plaintiffs, would be required to pay in a transaction involving a government insured loan to the purchaser of their house. Defendant’s demurrer was based on its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Haeger v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Horton v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2016
  2. Cullen v. Investment Strategies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Mikityuk v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
  4. Barinaga v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
  5. Roisland v. Flagstar Bank, FSBDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API