United States v. Huggins
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On December 12, 2007, defendant Andre M. Huggins (“defendant”) filed a pro se motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 983(e) 1 seeking to set aside a declaration of forfeiture. (D.I. 313) Defendant contends that he never received notice of the government’s administrative forfeiture proceedings on items seized during the execution of search warrants on August 26, 2003. (Id. at 4) Defendant asserts that this failure on the government’s part to give him notice constitutes a violation of his Fifth Amendment due process rights. (Id. at 5-6)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- VanHorn v. D.E.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
- United States of America v. Joseph Albert Roberts and Christine NiedermeyerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Vanhorn v. DeaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2009