Legal Opinion
Lucy v. Manville Sales Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 5, 1987No. Action 86-F-2394PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SHERMAN G. FINESILVER, Chief Judge.
This is an employment discrimination case. Plaintiff, a former employee of the defendant, claims he was denied a promotion because of his race and age. Plaintiff brings claims based on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 626 et seq. Defendant Manville Sales Corporation has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment.
Plaintiff, David R. Lucy, began working for Manville in 1972 as a management trainee. He was promoted to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Abraham Mohammed v. Howard H. Callaway, Secretary, United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellee v. University of Oklahoma, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- 44 Fair empl.prac.cas. 391, 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,229 Edward S. Furr, Lynden E. Petersen, Daniel F. O'connell, and James W. Hunt, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants, and Jon A. Easter, Lee W. Fowler, and Marvin C. Brown v. At & T Technologies, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ofelia Randle v. City of AuroraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995