Legal Opinion
People v. Hill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 12, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that County Court did not adequately instruct the jury concerning the proof of intent required to support a conviction of robbery in the first degree based on accessorial liability (see, People v Slacks, 90 NY2d 850, 851). Likewise without merit is defendant’s contention that the court did not adequately sanction the People for their Rosario violation. The record establishes that the police officer who interviewed defendant made notes of that interview and used them in conjunction with preparing his report. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. RanghelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. SlacksNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. FrazierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. PageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Hill v. SenkowskiDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
- Whitlatch v. SenkowskiDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
- PAGE, CORLAN, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. PageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013