Legal Opinion
Keating v. Philip Morris, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 22, 1987No. C6-87-1385PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant James Keating filed a class action complaint on July 30, 1979, alleging a conspiracy among respondent cigarette manufacturers to fix cigarette prices, in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 325D.49-325D.66 (Minnesota Antitrust Law of 1971).
In 1985, appellant received a form notice that the case would be dismissed for failure to prosecute if it was not ready for trial in' one year. On November 13, 1985, appellant moved for class certification, which was denied on August 21, 1986.
On February 12, 1987, respondents’ motion for summary judgment was heard. On April 6, 1987,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Windham v. American Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Alabama v. Blue Bird Body Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- In re Relafen Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- American Computer Trust Leasing v. Jack Farrell Implement Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.