Legal Opinion

St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 6, 1893No. 286PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIGHTFOOT, Chief Justice.

The following statement of the case, made by appellant, is substantially correct:

Amelia Taylor, as surviving wife, and her two sons, James G. Taylor and J. Edwin Taylor, by their mother as next friend, the surviving children of James Gf. Taylor, deceased, bring, in the District Court of Navarro County, Texas, suit for the death of James G. Taylor, claiming actual damages in the sum of $10,000; alleging, substantially, that on the 9th of March, 1888, appellant, as defendant in the court below, by carelessness and negligence, ran its cars against and knocked down and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. East Line & Red River Railway Co. v. CulbersonTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. KutacTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Medlin v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Greathouse v. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Thurman v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Cobb Brick Co. v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Cobb Brick Co. v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API