East Line & Red River Railway Co. v. Culberson
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Morris. Tried below before the Hon. W. P. McLean. The facts developed on the trial' of this cause, resulting in a verdict for twelve thousand dollars for the wife and the children of the deceased husband and father are not important in view of the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Gaines, Associate Justice.
On a former day of the term, appellee submitted a motion to strike out the statement of facts as it appears in the transcript. The ground of this motion is, that the statement is not prepared in accordance with the rules, but consists wholly of the questions to and answers of the witnesses upon the trial, exactly as they were uttered and as they were written out by the stenographer after being taken down in short hand. The motion was taken under advisement, to be disposed of with the case when submitted. We are now required to pass upon it.
The statement of facts is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railroad v. Le GierseTexas Supreme Court · 1879
- Buffalo Bayou Ship Channel Co. v. BrulyTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1878
- Hawkins v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Dreiss v. FriedrichTexas Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by32 opinions
- Needham v. CooneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Barmore v. DarraghCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Shawnee Gas & Electric Co. v. MotesenbockerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Greathouse v. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Schafer v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.