Algie Neal v. GMTCare, LLC
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 Algie Neal, Case No. 2:25-cv-01176-APG-NJK 6 Plaintiff(s), Order 7 v. [Docket No. 20] 8 GMTCare, LLC, 9 Defendant(s). 10 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel. Docket No. 20.1 Defendant filed 11 a response in opposition. Docket No. 21. No reply was filed. The motion is properly resolved 12 without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. 13 “[B]road discretion is vested in the trial court to permit or deny discovery.” Hallett v. 14 Morgan,
296 F.3d 732, 751
(9th Cir. 2002); see also Crawford-El v. Britton, 523 U.S. 574, 598 15…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Uttecht v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.