Legal Opinion

Soler v. G & U, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 24, 1991No. Nos. 78 Civ. 6252(CHT), 78 Civ. 6257(CHT)—78 Civ. 6261(CHT), 80 Civ. 3506(CHT) and 83 Civ. 9122(CHT)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TENNEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, approximately 100 migrant farmworkers (“migrant workers” or “workers”), instituted this consolidated action under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (1988) (“FLSA”), against defendants, six farm owners in Orange County, New York (“owners”).1 The workers seek to recover “rent” deducted from their wages by the owners for the on-site housing which the owners provided during the 1978-83 growing seasons. The workers argue that in deducting the “rent” from their wages, the owners violated the minimum wage provisions of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Soler v. G & U, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  2. Estanislau v. Manchester Developers, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
  3. Balbed v. Eden Park Guest House, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API