Legal Opinion
Smith v. Nieves
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 24, 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
197 N.J. Super. 609 (1984)
485 A.2d 1066
LENA R. SMITH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS
v.
ROSENDO NIEVES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 4, 1984.
Decided December 24, 1984.
Before Judges ANTELL, J.H. COLEMAN and SIMPSON.
Karl A. Fenske argued the cause for appellants (Karl A. Fenske, attorney; Karl A. Fenske on the brief).
Robert M. Messina argued the cause for respondents, Town of Nutley, Department of Police, et al. (Henry S. Buchanan, attorney; Robert M. Messina on the brief).
William P. Ries argued the cause for respondents Town of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Costa v. JoseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Chambers v. Ideal Pure Milk Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
- City of Miami v. HorneSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- City of Tampa v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Boyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Tice v. CramerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Hooper v. City of Chula VistaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Fagan v. City of VinelandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Tice v. CramerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.