Legal Opinion
Tice v. Cramer
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 16, 1992PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
254 N.J. Super. 641 (1992)
604 A.2d 183
JOHN W. TICE, SR., ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF JOHN W. TICE, JR., DECEASED, AND JOHN W. TICE, SR., GENERAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN W. TICE, JR., DECEASED, AND JOHN W. TICE, SR., AND RITA TICE, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
ROBERT CRAMER, CITY OF WILDWOOD, CITY OF WILDWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND WILLIAM G. LOGAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 11, 1991.
Decided March 16, 1992.
Before Judges KING, DREIER and GRUCCIO.
Anne P. McHugh argued the cause for appellants (Pellettieri,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rochinsky v. State of NJ, Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Kirk v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Marley v. Palmyra Bor.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Burke v. DeinerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Pico v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tice v. CramerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Fielder v. StonackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Blunt v. KlapprothNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Fagan v. City of VinelandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Fielder v. JenkinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.