Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Helms
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 8, 1983No. Nos. 82-1527, 82-1648PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit' Judge WILKEY.
WILKEY, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners, an association of airline pilots and individual airline pilots suffering from coronary heart disease, challenge an amendment to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rules for the issuance of airman medical certificates. Under the previous rules, a medical certificate could not be issued to a pilot who suffered from coronary heart disease which might be “reasonably expected to lead to myocardial infarction.”1 The challenged amendment provides that a medical history or clinical diagnosis of coronary heart…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. George P. Shultz, Secretary, U. S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Ass'n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Satellite Business Systems, Isa Communications Services, Inc., Aeronautical Radio, Inc., American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Missouri Public Service Commission, Arizona Corporation Commission, New York State Department of Public Service, Southern Pacific Communications Company, State of Michigan, Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, New Jersey Bell Telephone Company, Intervenors. The People of the State of California and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Satellite Business Systems, Isa Communications Services, Inc., Aeronautical Radio, Inc., American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Southern Pacific Communications Company, Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, New Jersey Bell Telephone Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Ventress v. Japan AirlinesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Bartel v. National Transportation Safety BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Kelleam F. Childers v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.