Gollihar v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
KEASLER, J.,
delivered this concurring and dissenting opinion, in which HERVEY, J„ joined.
I respect and appreciate the majority’s attempt to clarify an unclear area of the law. But I would resolve the issues differently.
I
The majority concludes that our variance law conflicts with our surplusage law and, therefore, overrules all surplusage law. Rather than overruling surplusage law, I would seize this opportunity to clarify variance law.
The problem with our variance caselaw is our failure to distinguish between two different issues — lack of notice and insufficient evidence. The word “variance”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Rojas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Burrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Ortega v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.