Legal Opinion

Mauritz v. Schwind

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1937No. 4667PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

Laura E. Schwind and Faith Summers, mother and daughter, joined pro forma by their respective husbands, sued appellants for about 2,500 acres of land in the aggregate, consisting of a large number of small tracts in two adjoining subdivisions. Appellants thereafter filed a cross-action against the above parties, together with Frank L. Brown and Valley Fruit Farm & Garden Company (hereafter referred to as the Company) as additional parties.

Appellants briefly and in substance pleaded:

1. A purchase of all of said land at valid tax sales held in 1931 and 1932.

2. Purchase of same…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Spence v. State Nat. Bank of El PasoTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Burnett v. AtteberryTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Holt v. GordonTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Blewitt v. . BoorumNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Robert B. Elliott v. The University of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. San Antonio Savings Ass'n v. Palmer, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
  4. Best v. BestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. City of Lubbock v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API