Legal Opinion

Agarwal v. Napolitano

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided October 9, 2009No. 2:07-mj-00373PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KATHLEEN CARDONE, District Judge.

On this day, the Court considered Defendants’ “Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint And/Or For Summary Judgment” (“Motion”) (Doc. No. 39). For the reasons set forth herein, the Motion is DENIED. Additionally, the decisions of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, dated May 4, 2009, denying the naturalization petitions of Ajai and Divya Agarwal, are hereby VACATED as ultra vires.

I. BACKGROUND

Ajai and Divya Agarwal (“Agarwals”) are natives and citizens of India. Defs.’ Reply Ex. A at 13 (Doc. No. 46). Ajai Agarwal first entered the United…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  5. Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. KHAMOOSHPOUR v. HolderDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
  2. Martinez v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
  3. Omar v. HolderDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  4. Filemon Torres Sanchez v. United States Citizenship Immigration Services et al.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2025
  5. Hernandez v. McAleenanDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API