Legal Opinion
KHAMOOSHPOUR v. Holder
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 14, 2011No. CV-10-01266-PHX-NVWPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, and ORDER
NEIL V. WAKE, District Judge.
Plaintiff is before the Court seeking de novo review, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1421(c), of the March 9, 2010 decision of the United States Customs and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) denying his application for naturalization. The Court conducted an evidentiary hearing on Plaintiffs application on January 26 and 27, 2011. This order states the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
I. Findings of Fact
As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fedorenko v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Berenyi v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. GinsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. Thi Marilyn DangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. HsuCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. SalamaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Aghaian v. MinassianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems v. State of OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Saubhayana v. SessionsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020