Legal Opinion
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 8, 1951No. 32Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
340 U.S. 147 (1950)
GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO.
v.
SUPERMARKET EQUIPMENT CORP.
No. 32.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 18-19, 1950.
Decided December 4, 1950.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
John H. Glaccum argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Edwin J. Balluff.
Townsend F. Beaman argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Lloyd W. Patch.
2Opinion of the Court · JacksonJustice Jackson
Two courts below have concurred in holding three patent claims to be valid,[1] and it is stipulated that, if valid, they have been infringed. The issue, for the resolution…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited35 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.