Legal Opinion

Burchett v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1912No. 1,000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. George Burchett and others were convicted of conspiring to prevent a witness from attending and testifying, and they bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

GOFF, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in error, George Burchett, Columbus Colley, Jim Sykes, and Logan Salyers, were convicted in the court below on an indictment charging violations of sections 5399, 5404, and 5406 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 3656, 3657). They were found guilty of unlawfully conspiring together to prevent, and of preventing by force, threats, and intimidation, a witness from attending and testifying in the court below.

[1] The verdict was returned on the 10th day of August, 1910, and the sentence of the court was imposed on that day.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Noles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  2. State v. GilbertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1841
  3. United States v. GoodrichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  4. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. ConoleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1894
  5. Lloyd v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lahman v. Burnes Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. Roberts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  3. R. D. Cole Mfg. Co. v. MendenhallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917
  4. State v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API