Spruytte v. Hoffner
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Floyd J. Spruytte, Jr. (“Spruytte”) and Edward Rimka (“Rim-ka”), have sued Defendants, Robert Collins (“Collins”), Bonita Hoffner (“Hoffner”), and Bill Martin (“Martin”), alleging that Collins and Hoffner retaliated against them for exercising their First Amendment rights by transferring them from the Lakeland Correctional Facility to other prison facilities. 1 Plaintiffs have sued Col lins and Hoffner in their individual and official capacities. Martin, the Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections, is sued…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shehee v. LuttrellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McKerchie 632622 v. WrigglesworthDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
- Myers v. LindseyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020