Legal Opinion
Johnson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 26, 1993No. 91-CF-974PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
The question in this appeal is whether, upon resentencing for a lesser included offense after a guilty plea, the trial court violated appellant’s due process rights or abused its discretion by imposing a sentence that is greater than the sentence originally imposed after a trial on the greater offense but a sentence that is still less than the total cumulative sentence previously imposed. We find no error by the trial judge, and therefore we affirm.
I
Appellant Vincent A. Johnson was convicted, by a jury, of one count of armed robbery, D.C.Code §§ 22-2901, -3202 (Repl.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Yemson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. NellomsOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Jacob Herring v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.