Legal Opinion

Jacob Herring v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 14, 2017No. 16-CO-689PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fisher, Associate Judge:

After otherwise affirming appellant Jacob Herring’s convictions on direct appeal, we remanded with instructions to merge his two convictions for possession of a firearm during a crime of violence (“PFCV”). On remand, the trial court amended the judgment and commitment order by removing the consecutive PFCV count, but it retained a total sentence consistent with vacating the concurrent count. Upon discovering the mistake, the eourt reinstated the consecutive count, confirming that it had not intended to reduce appellant’s total sentence. The principal issue before us…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dominic A. White v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Jordan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. United States v. FaconDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Ward v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API