Legal Opinion

Mark v. William Muschel, Inc.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided June 9, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lewis R. Friedman, J.

This court, pursuant to RPAPL article 7-A, appointed an administrator for a loft building which contains both commercial and residential units. The instant motion by the owner *805seeks to have the court cancel three leases entered into by the administrator shortly after her appointment. The court has denied a prior motion for the same relief. The instant motion, denominated one for reargument and renewal, presents arguments and questions not adequately addressed before. The three lessees have now been served with the motion; each has appeared and opposes…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gilberg v. BarbieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. 219 Broadway Corp. v. Alexander's, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Koch v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Copeland v. SalomonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Voccola v. ShillingNew York Supreme Court · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Talbot Typographics, Inc. v. Tenba, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1990
  2. Matthews v. Marcus Garvey Brownstone Houses, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API