Consolidated Motors Co. v. Urschel
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mason, J.:
Consolidated Motors Company sued D. F. Urschel, claiming to be the holder in due course of a negotiable note upon which he was liable. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff and the defendant appeals.
1. The instrument sued upon was a “myself” note, executed by Urschel, made payable to his own order, and by him indorsed in blank. The answer alleged that Urschel signed, indorsed and delivered the note to the Associated Mill and Elevator Company, being induced to do so by its false and fraudulent misrepresentations of material matters. In the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Madison Square Bank v. PierceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Beachy v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Ireland v. ShoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Leach v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Page v. W. F. Hallam & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Farmers State Bank v. BrennekeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Pioneer Trust Co. v. CombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Kansas Bankers Surety Co. v. Ford County State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. HeilmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.