Legal Opinion

Daniel v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 2, 1957No. Record 4694PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, C. J.

Loney L. Daniel instituted this action against the city of Richmond and Virginia Electric and Power Company, to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained when his hand came in contact with a high tension electric wire, alleged to have been negligently erected and maintained by defendants, and each of them, in dangerous proximity to an exit or fire escape of a building located on Williamsburg Avenue, Richmond, Virginia, where he worked.

It was alleged in the motion for judgment that notice of the injury suffered by plaintiff “was filed with said city as required by law.” The city in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of TrusteesNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. City of Portsmouth v. WeissSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. Bowles v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
  4. City of South Norfolk v. DailSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  5. O'Neil v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Town of Crewe v. MarlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Insurance Co. of Puerto Rico v. Ruiz MoralesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1968
  3. Maier v. City of KetchikanAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hill v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Heller v. City of Virginia BeachSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API