Legal Opinion

United States v. Hanhardt

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 7, 2004No. 00 CR 853-1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is the United States’ Motion for Entry of Order of Garnishment. For the following reasons, the Motion is granted.

I. BACKGROUND

In October 2001, Defendant William Hanhardt (“Hanhardt”), a former Chief of Detectives of the Chicago Police Department, pled guilty to two counts of racketeering and conspiracy (18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1962(d)) involving jewel theft. This court sentenced Hanhardt to a term of 188 months imprisonment (Hanhardt’s sen tence was reduced on remand to 141 months), followed by three years supervised release. Additionally,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Kevin P. Sensmeier and Neil E. SensmeierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Thomas AmbroseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. JamesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
  4. United States v. Vitek Supply Corporation, Nutritional Products & Services, Inc., and Animix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Floyd Loyd, Also Known as L. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
  2. United States v. RoushDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
  3. United States v. HawkinsDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2005
  4. Greene v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. United States v. OgburnDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API