Legal Opinion
Lombardo v. Albu
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 2000No. CV-99-0316-PRPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARTONE, Justice.
¶ 1 This is an action in tort in which the. seller of real property seeks damages from the buyer’s real estate agent for failing to inform the seller that the buyer was or might have been unable to perform because of financial difficulties. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the buyer’s agent on the basis that the buyer’s agent had no legal duty to the seller. The court of appeals affirmed. Lombardo v. Albu, 197 Ariz. 340, 4 P.3d 395 (App.1999). Because of the importance of the issue, and a conflict with Aranki v. RKP Investments, Inc., 194 Ariz. 206,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maxwell v. Fidelity Financial Services, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Aranki v. RKP Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Hill v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Lombardo v. AlbuCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Stanley v. McCarverArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- Paradigm Insurance v. Langerman Law Offices, P.A.Arizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Grubb & Ellis Management Services, Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.