Legal Opinion

Hall v. W. M. Ritter Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 11, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.

Plaintiff in error, plaintiff in the lower court, instituted this action to recover the value of standing timber cut and removed from his premises, and incidental damages to the land in so doing. The trial court, on motion of defendant, the W. M. Ritter Lumber Co., struck the evidence and entered judgment for it.

While plaintiff assigns four errors to the ruling of the trial court, the decision in the case turns on the construction of a deed dated August 22, 1921, by which plaintiff conveyed certain standing timber on the land described therein to defendant. This deed contains the usual…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Young v. Camp Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  2. Smith v. RamseySupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
  3. Blackstone Manufacturing Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  4. Brown v. Surry Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  5. Hartley v. NeavesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Sun Lumber Co. v. Thompson Land & Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Goin v. AbsherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  4. Spruce v. WhiteDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1942
  5. Sun Lumber Co. v. Thompson Land & Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API