Legal Opinion

Tolbert v. Burke

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Washtenaw. (Kinne, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is a suit brought by the plaintiff to-recover the value of a bill of lumber alleged by him to-have been sold and delivered to the defendant.

The plaintiff’s theory was that in the fall of 1889 Mr. Scott, a builder, entered into a contract with the defendant, William Burke, to repair or rebuild a house for him in the city of Ann Arbor. Mr. Scott was to furnish all the materials, including lumber, for $1,350. Mr. Scott, took his bill for lumber, and gave it to Mr. Keech, manager of the plaintiff, Mr. Tolbert, who entered it. upon his order-book. So far there does not appear to be any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crippen v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rice v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Noban v. ShoupMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Freda v. TishbeinMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. People v. DroletMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Bamlet Realty Co. v. DoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API