Tolbert v. Burke
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Washtenaw. (Kinne, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This is a suit brought by the plaintiff to-recover the value of a bill of lumber alleged by him to-have been sold and delivered to the defendant.
The plaintiff’s theory was that in the fall of 1889 Mr. Scott, a builder, entered into a contract with the defendant, William Burke, to repair or rebuild a house for him in the city of Ann Arbor. Mr. Scott was to furnish all the materials, including lumber, for $1,350. Mr. Scott, took his bill for lumber, and gave it to Mr. Keech, manager of the plaintiff, Mr. Tolbert, who entered it. upon his order-book. So far there does not appear to be any…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Crippen v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rice v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Noban v. ShoupMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Freda v. TishbeinMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. DroletMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Bamlet Realty Co. v. DoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.