Legal Opinion

Wingert v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1913No. Docket No. 111PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Van Zile, J. Case by William Wingert against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Plaintiff, with one horse and an empty wagon, on which was a rack for carrying empty barrels, was proceeding westward on Monroe avenue in the city of Detroit. He was driving on defendant’s track. He knew there was a street car, going west, approaching, and he attempted to leave the track. Defendant’s motorman saw plaintiff driving on the track, saw his efforts to leave the track, and, as the car approached the wagon, reduced the speed of the car so that for some distance it approximated the speed at which plaintiff was moving. However, in trying to pass the wagon, the car struck the rear…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rouse v. Detroit Electric RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Bowen v. Detroit City Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Laughlin v. Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Manor v. Bay Cities Consolidated Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hibbler v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Golob v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Bloch v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. McNeal v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API