Legal Opinion
Herbst v. Scott
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 5, 1995No. 93-02618PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:
Treating the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc as Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. No member of the panel nor Judge in regular active service of the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (FRAP and Local Rule 35), the Suggestion for Rehearing En Bane is also DENIED.
On our own motion we held the mandate in this matter. Having reconsidered the ease we recall our prior opinion 1 and substitute the following.
Appellant Cohn J. Herbst, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals the trial court’s abuse of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Clark v. Bear Stearns & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pack v. YusuffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Garry Lee Moore v. Raymond Roberts, Superintendent of Mississippi State Penitentiary Michael C. Moore, Attorney General, State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Dilworth v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Grady v. ArtuzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Archie I. Floyd, Jr. v. George D. Alexander, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.