State Ex Rel. Brookfield Co. v. Mart
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
August 2,1929, the Brookfield Company, which is the relator in this proceeding, instituted a suit in the circuit court of Clatsop county against this defendant, alleging that the latter had received for the plaintiff’s use $1,330.57 in cash, and municipal warrants in the amount of $13,500; following other averments, which the plaintiff evidently intended should confer jurisdiction upon a court of equity, the complaint prayed for ‘ ‘ a judgment and decree against the defendant * * *. Third: For a mandatory injunction ordering and directing defendant to forthwith deposit with the clerk” the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- In re NevittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Haaren v. MouldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- State v. HeiserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. SieberOregon Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- California Trust Co. v. CassidyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Weingart v. KiessenbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Elkhorn Baptist Church v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- Forte v. PageOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- State ex rel. Middlemas v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.