Legal Opinion

Bae v. T.D. Service Co. of Arizona

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 2016No. B262921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANELLA, J.

— In the underlying action, appellant James Bae and a corporation related to him asserted claims arising from a foreclosure sale against several defendants, including respondent T.D. Service Company of Arizona. Respondent filed an unchallenged declaration of nonmonetary status under Civil Code section 2924Í, asserting that it had been named as a defendant solely in its capacity as trustee under the pertinent deed of trust, and not due to any wrongful conduct in its performance as trustee. After respondent filed no answer in the action, the clerk entered respondent’s default,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Moeller v. Chun-Yen LienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pulte Homes Corp. v. Williams Mechanical, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Airs Aromatics, LLC v. CBL Data Recovery Tech. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Scales v. Bradley CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Wong v. Mah CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API